Live · Game Day Saturday, September 12, 2026 Canadian sport, covered
Garbutt Disposal
Canadian sport, covered without the noise.
Phoenix Suns' 2026-27 roster rankings reveal divided staff opinions on key players
Basketball

Phoenix Suns' 2026-27 roster rankings reveal divided staff opinions on key players

Bright Side of the Sun staff writers present their preseason player rankings ahead of the 2026-27 NBA season, highlighting key disagreements on roster value and philosophical approaches to player evaluation.

DC

As the Phoenix Suns prepare to tip off the 2026-27 NBA season, the Bright Side of the Sun writing staff has unveiled their comprehensive preseason player rankings, providing basketball fans with a revealing look at how analysts internally view the team's roster hierarchy. This annual SunsRank tradition offers more than just a simple list - it exposes the fundamental differences in how professional evaluators assess player value, potential, and fit within a team's system when all they have to work with are summer workouts, training camp reports, and past performance.

The methodology behind the rankings

The SunsRank exercise begins as a straightforward but revealing question: Who is better than whom? What makes it compelling is that there are no clear right answers when projecting future performance. Writer Mark Bowser explained his value-based approach, saying

I viewed the rank as a question of value, which, to me, needs to consider production per dollar of contract amount. Right now, Gillespie and even Goodwin have shown more value per dollar and greater availability.
This analytical framework led him to rank certain role players higher than peers who might focus more on raw talent or upside.

The rankings serve as a time capsule of staff thinking before any regular season games are played, creating accountability as the season progresses. They also reveal how different writers weigh various factors like health history, contract value, skill fit, and developmental potential when stacking players against each other.

Center position sparks heated debate

No position generated more disagreement than the center spot, where Mark Williams' evaluation split the staff. Tom Mildenberger voiced significant concerns, stating

Any discussion about Mark Williams has to start and end with availability. 60 games were a jump, but he wasn't available when we needed him the most in the postseason.
His critique extended beyond health, noting
despite his Go-Go-Gadget arms, he's not a great rim protector, nor is he a plus rebounder for his position.

This skeptical view contrasts sharply with Kevin Humphreys' endorsement of Oso Ighodaro, who played all 82 games last season. Humphreys emphasized how Ighodaro's

switching ability on defense and his connectivity on offense are unique to the roster
- skills particularly valuable on a team featuring ball-dominant scorers. The stark difference in these evaluations shows how staff members prioritize different center attributes based on their vision of modern NBA success.

The rookie wild card

First-year forward Peat emerged as one of the roster's most polarizing figures, with analysts deeply divided on his immediate NBA readiness. Bowser made the most bullish case, arguing

I believe Peat's body is NBA-ready, and he brings a lot of what the Suns don't have at the forward position. He is a bruiser. He is physical. He plays with toughness, and plays with an edge.
This enthusiasm stemmed from Peat's potential to address Phoenix's lack of physicality and secondary playmaking.

Bowser went further, suggesting

many will look back and wonder how he fell as far as he did
in the draft. Such strong belief in a rookie's immediate impact is rare, indicating some staff members see Peat as the type of mature, physically developed first-year player who can contribute faster than typical prospects. His evaluation became a litmus test for how analysts balance present readiness against future potential.

The role player conundrum

Holden Sherman delivered one of the harshest assessments in ranking Dunn, stating bluntly

Once Rasheer Fleming started to get more playing time, Dunn became unplayable. His inability to space the floor and his lack of progression on the offensive end renders him unplayable when Phoenix is playing a center or forward that can't space the floor.
This harsh take reflects how the modern NBA's spacing requirements can quickly make certain skill sets obsolete.

Bruce Veliz offered a more optimistic view of another reserve, ranking Bouyea 13th because

he has proved last year that if he gets an opportunity, he can make the most of it.
These contrasting evaluations of end-of-bench players show how staff members disagree on what traits matter most for deep reserves - proven competence in limited minutes versus theoretical upside that might never materialize.

Connectors versus creators

A fascinating philosophical divide emerged in how different writers value supporting players who facilitate rather than dominate offense. Humphreys emphasized this when praising Ighodaro, noting

With score-first players like Jalen Green, Dillon Brooks, and Miles Bridges all playing significant minutes, the Suns will need connectors on the floor.
This perspective values the subtle skills that help stars thrive over traditional box score production.

The concept explains why some analysts ranked Ighodaro above more statistically productive players. In their view, his ability to set screens, make quick decisions, and defend multiple positions creates more overall value than a higher-usage reserve who might disrupt offensive flow. This analytical school prioritizes how pieces fit together over individual talent evaluation.

What these rankings teach us

The SunsRank exercise provides more than entertainment - it offers a masterclass in how professional analysts approach the inherently subjective task of player evaluation. The significant deviations on certain players prove that even experienced observers working with the same information can reach wildly different conclusions based on their evaluation criteria.

As the season unfolds, these rankings will serve as a measuring stick for which analytical frameworks proved most prescient. They also give fans multiple lenses through which to view roster decisions, rather than presenting a false consensus. Most importantly, they remind us that in NBA analysis, reasonable minds can disagree - especially when projecting how skills, health, and opportunity will intersect over an 82-game season.